Thursday, June 16, 2011
Monday, June 13, 2011
Mikaela Shiffrin..... The 'Future' is here
![[4411250950_27c96789eb_b.jpg]](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjzXIenBY_yLr5jB5A4dJVcXS_J_Jjk9QoI2y9ksJFvV-z-8evdMdRqon0gyueC6cOxMG1b7c6uqy6Vrj2n-0Ovn5JZFEv4xZ1GBzNdr95tUyyTTDAgonYcsviHlfvzpKZUJPRqW2ca25ZN/s1600/4411250950_27c96789eb_b.jpg) |
Shiffrin Wins Trofeo Topolino Slalom |
U.S. Ski Team members were down at Mammoth Mountain holding racing camps. These kids are pretty BAD ASS. All of 'em were arcing some really fast nice turns. Mikaela Shiffrin, 16 years old, was just killing it. I couldn't 'buy a turn' as good as she was layin down.
"A sophomore at Burke Mountain Academy, Shiffrin, who turned 16 in March, had a remarkable year. She took control of the NorAm standings in December, winning a super combined. She then stood on the NorAm podium three more times over three days and in January won two NorAm slaloms.
At the 2011 Junior World Championships, Shiffrin earned a bronze medal in slalom despite competing with a heavy cold. U.S. Ski Team coaches took notice and offered her a World Cup start in March where she missed qualifying for a second run of slalom by five hundredths of a second.
By mid-month, she had sealed the NorAm slalom title and took third overall. But Shiffrin saved her best for last. At the Putnam Investments U.S. Alpine Championships in Winter Park, CO, she won her first national title, taking the slalom crown ahead of four-time Olympian Sarah Schleper (Vail, CO) and Resi Stiegler (Jackson Hole, WY). At the awards banquet that night, Shiffrin was named Ski Racing Magazine’s Junior of the Year.
"I guess anything is possible," said Shiffrin after the slalom win in Winter Park. "Sarah [Schleper] and Resi [Stiegler] have been so supportive of me, beating them today is a crazy feeling but the better part about it was that they were still supportive of it. This is the best end to a season ever."
A former member of the Ford Sayre program and Lebanon Outing Club, Shiffrin splits her time between East Burke, VT, and Vail, CO. As for her long-term goals, her dad, Jeff Shiffrin, says she “keeps them under wraps.”
http://www.usskiteam.com/alpine/news?storyId=3750
Friday, June 10, 2011
Thursday, June 9, 2011
The 16 Top Medical Marijuana Strains
White Berry
A-Train
Dr. Grinspoon
Blue Dreams
G-13 Haze
Canna Sutra
Lavender
Crimea Blue
Nigerian
Mazar
Purple Kush
Satori
Romulan
S.A.G.E.
Vortex
Jack Herer
Source & Story Link Here
A-Train
Dr. Grinspoon
Blue Dreams
G-13 Haze
Canna Sutra
Lavender
Crimea Blue
Nigerian
Mazar
Purple Kush
Satori
Romulan
S.A.G.E.
Vortex
Jack Herer
Source & Story Link Here
Monday, June 6, 2011
Urban Chicken Raising Solution
'The Chicken Tractor'
for the 'modern' chicken farmer
- Impress your urban chicks with a cozy minimalist interior
- Warm tones & shades designed to enhance egg laying, increase girth, & delight your pals
- "Patented Optimal Organic Process" of fertilization ensures green lawns and is easily moved
- NEVER be in the dog house again...you have the Chicken Tractor...cozy as home!
Sunday, June 5, 2011
Learn To Get Rich For ONLY $20!!
You don't need a degree in finance, MBA, or suffer through three years (or more) trying to pass the CFA program. No, just pony up $20 (or go online at Walmart for just a measly $12.05) and buy this GREAT little book.
You'll be glad you did...
Friday, June 3, 2011
1937 All Over Again?
OP-ED COLUMNIST
The Mistake of 2010
By PAUL KRUGMAN
Published: June 2, 2011
Earlier this week, the Federal Reserve Bank of New York published a blog post about the “mistake of 1937,” the premature fiscal and monetary pullback that aborted an ongoing economic recovery and prolonged the Great Depression. As Gauti Eggertsson, the post’s author (with whom I have done research) points out, economic conditions today — with output growing, some prices rising, but unemployment still very high — bear a strong resemblance to those in 1936-37. So are modern policy makers going to make the same mistake?
Fred R. Conrad/The New York Times
Paul Krugman
Mr. Eggertsson says no, that economists now know better. But I disagree. In fact, in important ways we have already repeated the mistake of 1937. Call it the mistake of 2010: a “pivot” away from jobs to other concerns, whose wrongheadedness has been highlighted by recent economic data.To be sure, things could be worse — and there’s a strong chance that they will, indeed, get worse.Back when the original 2009 Obama stimulus was enacted, some of us warned that it was both too small and too short-lived. In particular, the effects of the stimulus would start fading out in 2010 — and given the fact that financial crises are usually followed by prolonged slumps, it was unlikely that the economy would have a vigorous self-sustaining recovery under way by then.By the beginning of 2010, it was already obvious that these concerns had been justified. Yet somehow an overwhelming consensus emerged among policy makers and pundits that nothing more should be done to create jobs, that, on the contrary, there should be a turn toward fiscal austerity.This consensus was fed by scare stories about an imminent loss of market confidence in U.S. debt. Every uptick in interest rates was interpreted as a sign that the “bond vigilantes” were on the attack, and this interpretation was often reported as a fact, not as a dubious hypothesis.For example, in March 2010, The Wall Street Journal published an article titled “Debt Fears Send Rates Up,” reporting that long-term U.S. interest rates had risen and asserting — without offering any evidence — that this rise, to about 3.9 percent, reflected concerns about the budget deficit. In reality, it probably reflected several months of decent jobs numbers, which temporarily raised optimism about recovery.But never mind. Somehow it became conventional wisdom that the deficit, not unemployment, was Public Enemy No. 1 — a conventional wisdom both reflected in and reinforced by a dramatic shift in news coverage away from unemployment and toward deficit concerns. Job creation effectively dropped off the agenda.So, here we are, in the middle of 2011. How are things going?Well, the bond vigilantes continue to exist only in the deficit hawks’ imagination. Long-term interest rates have fluctuated with optimism or pessimism about the economy; a recent spate of bad news has sent them down to about 3 percent, not far from historic lows.And the news has, indeed, been bad. As the stimulus has faded out, so have hopes of strong economic recovery. Yes, there has been some job creation — but at a pace barely keeping up with population growth. The percentage of American adults with jobs, which plunged between 2007 and 2009, has barely budged since then. And the latest numbers suggest that even this modest, inadequate job growth is sputtering out.So, as I said, we have already repeated a version of the mistake of 1937, withdrawing fiscal support much too early and perpetuating high unemployment.Yet worse things may soon happen.On the fiscal side, Republicans are demanding immediate spending cuts as the price of raising the debt limit and avoiding a U.S. default. If this blackmail succeeds, it will put a further drag on an already weak economy.Meanwhile, a loud chorus is demanding that the Fed and its counterparts abroad raise interest rates to head off an alleged inflationary threat. As the New York Fed article points out, the rise in consumer price inflation over the past few months — which is already showing signs of tailing off — reflected temporary factors, and underlying inflation remains low. And smart economists like Mr. Eggerstsson understand this. But the European Central Bank is already raising rates, and the Fed is under pressure to do the same. Further attempts to help the economy expand seem out of the question.So the mistake of 2010 may yet be followed by an even bigger mistake. Even if that doesn’t happen, however, the fact is that the policy response to the crisis was and remains vastly inadequate.Those who refuse to learn from history are condemned to repeat it; we did, and we are. What we’re experiencing may not be a full replay of the Great Depression, but that’s little consolation for the millions of American families suffering from a slump that just goes on and on.source: NY Times June 2, 2011
.
By PAUL KRUGMAN
Earlier this week, the Federal Reserve Bank of New York published a blog post about the “mistake of 1937,” the premature fiscal and monetary pullback that aborted an ongoing economic recovery and prolonged the Great Depression. As Gauti Eggertsson, the post’s author (with whom I have done research) points out, economic conditions today — with output growing, some prices rising, but unemployment still very high — bear a strong resemblance to those in 1936-37. So are modern policy makers going to make the same mistake?
Fred R. Conrad/The New York Times
Paul Krugman
Mr. Eggertsson says no, that economists now know better. But I disagree. In fact, in important ways we have already repeated the mistake of 1937. Call it the mistake of 2010: a “pivot” away from jobs to other concerns, whose wrongheadedness has been highlighted by recent economic data.
To be sure, things could be worse — and there’s a strong chance that they will, indeed, get worse.
Back when the original 2009 Obama stimulus was enacted, some of us warned that it was both too small and too short-lived. In particular, the effects of the stimulus would start fading out in 2010 — and given the fact that financial crises are usually followed by prolonged slumps, it was unlikely that the economy would have a vigorous self-sustaining recovery under way by then.
By the beginning of 2010, it was already obvious that these concerns had been justified. Yet somehow an overwhelming consensus emerged among policy makers and pundits that nothing more should be done to create jobs, that, on the contrary, there should be a turn toward fiscal austerity.
This consensus was fed by scare stories about an imminent loss of market confidence in U.S. debt. Every uptick in interest rates was interpreted as a sign that the “bond vigilantes” were on the attack, and this interpretation was often reported as a fact, not as a dubious hypothesis.
For example, in March 2010, The Wall Street Journal published an article titled “Debt Fears Send Rates Up,” reporting that long-term U.S. interest rates had risen and asserting — without offering any evidence — that this rise, to about 3.9 percent, reflected concerns about the budget deficit. In reality, it probably reflected several months of decent jobs numbers, which temporarily raised optimism about recovery.
But never mind. Somehow it became conventional wisdom that the deficit, not unemployment, was Public Enemy No. 1 — a conventional wisdom both reflected in and reinforced by a dramatic shift in news coverage away from unemployment and toward deficit concerns. Job creation effectively dropped off the agenda.
So, here we are, in the middle of 2011. How are things going?
Well, the bond vigilantes continue to exist only in the deficit hawks’ imagination. Long-term interest rates have fluctuated with optimism or pessimism about the economy; a recent spate of bad news has sent them down to about 3 percent, not far from historic lows.
And the news has, indeed, been bad. As the stimulus has faded out, so have hopes of strong economic recovery. Yes, there has been some job creation — but at a pace barely keeping up with population growth. The percentage of American adults with jobs, which plunged between 2007 and 2009, has barely budged since then. And the latest numbers suggest that even this modest, inadequate job growth is sputtering out.
So, as I said, we have already repeated a version of the mistake of 1937, withdrawing fiscal support much too early and perpetuating high unemployment.
Yet worse things may soon happen.
On the fiscal side, Republicans are demanding immediate spending cuts as the price of raising the debt limit and avoiding a U.S. default. If this blackmail succeeds, it will put a further drag on an already weak economy.
Meanwhile, a loud chorus is demanding that the Fed and its counterparts abroad raise interest rates to head off an alleged inflationary threat. As the New York Fed article points out, the rise in consumer price inflation over the past few months — which is already showing signs of tailing off — reflected temporary factors, and underlying inflation remains low. And smart economists like Mr. Eggerstsson understand this. But the European Central Bank is already raising rates, and the Fed is under pressure to do the same. Further attempts to help the economy expand seem out of the question.
So the mistake of 2010 may yet be followed by an even bigger mistake. Even if that doesn’t happen, however, the fact is that the policy response to the crisis was and remains vastly inadequate.
Those who refuse to learn from history are condemned to repeat it; we did, and we are. What we’re experiencing may not be a full replay of the Great Depression, but that’s little consolation for the millions of American families suffering from a slump that just goes on and on.
source: NY Times June 2, 2011
.
.
57 percent of Afghan girls get married before the legal age of 16
Faiz Mohammed, 40, and Ghulam Haider, 11, sit in her family's home prior to their wedding
source: Foreign Policy may 19, 2011
Wednesday, June 1, 2011
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)